Monday, April 27, 2009

The Story of Bud

In the front yard of the Iowa Blog Cabin is a huge oak tree.  I've named it Goliath.  Goliath is a big guy.  Well, on a small - tiny - little branch of Goliath, is Bud.  This year, we're going to watch the life and times of Bud.  He's just a little guy right now.

Here's a picture of bud on April 23.

Here's a picture of Bud on April 24.
  
Bud on April 25
  
Bud  on April 27

It was too wet to go out and check on Bud on Sunday (it rained constantly), but I'm going to keep my eye on him all through the season.  Keep checking back for updates.  
  
Here's a pic of Goliath showing the location of Bud.
BONUS!  We want your predictions!  Post a comment now predicting what day this Fall Bud's leaf will flutter helplessly to the ground.  I predict October 7. The one with the right answer wins fabulous prizes!

Read more...

Friday, April 24, 2009

Friday's Rant: The Earth

All good things come to an end.  Here we are at the end of Earth Love Week '09.  It's been a great week - we've celebrated the many earthly resources that humanity utilize in order to create a better life:  coal, oil, natural gas, wildlife, forests and oceans - just to name a few.

Although the use of these resources have given us all a better life, improved our life expectancy and fueled the growth our nation, there is a group of people who oppose it.  They are called environmentalists.  To the environmentalists, there is not a greater blight on the earth than humanity - more specifically - western, white, capitalist, primarily American, humans. To them, the best case scenario would be complete human extinction.

Understanding the unlikelyhood of this scenario, they try and go about things a little differently.  They've refined their goals to primarily thrust at taking western culture to something as closely resembling the stone age as possible - sans the clothing from animal fur, that's cruel.

But I digress.  The ultimate goal of environmentalists has very little to do with the earth.  In fact, they really could care less.  Using the earth and the "green movement" is little more than a means to an end.  That end being control.  You see, the greatest enemy to the environmentalist is freedom.  The idea that people have the ability to decide the cars they drive, the temperature they keep their thermostat set at, the grocery bags they use, the light bulbs they have, the amount (and type) of energy they use, how far from "city centers" they live, where they shop, how they shop, what they spend their money on, what they insulate their house with, how much water they drink, what they drink their water out of, how a nation utilizes its own natural resources, what kind of toilet paper they wipe their butts with, what they eat, how they eat it, the CO2 they exhale, how fat they are, what they do with their spare time and how many children they "choose" to have is an unspeakable threat to the environmentalist.  They wake up every single day thinking up new ways to control the behavior of every single indvidual in the western world.

Their ration for wanting to control all of this behavior?  The decisions we make about our thermostats, the number of children we have, the car we drive and the toilet paper we use impacts all of us and the world we live in.  It's not a private decision, but a common issue that can't be left up to the individual to decide. 

This rant isn't simply the paranoia of someone the Dear Leader would describe as a "bitter clinger," or who Janet Nepalitano would describe as a "right-wing extremist."  It's reality.  Individual freedom, democracy, free choice and capitalism are absolutely contrary to the objectives of the environmentalist.

A few recent headlines:

Is Being Overweight a Climate Problem?
Coal burning must end, says scientist
One in Three Children Fear Earth Apocalypse
Senator calls cap-and-trade 'the most significant revenue-generating proposal of our time'
Trees are growing faster and could buy time to halt global warming
God 'will not give happy ending'

So in order to dismantle freedom, democracy and capitalism, the environmentalist goes about their day working to frighten enough people into thinking that we - more specifically - western culture is destroying the world.  The glaciers are melting!  The glaciers are melting!  Sea levels are rising!  Global temperatures are warming!  Islands are sinking!  CO2 levels are out of control - QUICK!  Everyone stop breathing!  Plastic water bottles are destroying the world!  SUVs burn too much gas!  Fat people use more carbon and demand too many resources! 

Since the environmentalist doesn't really have a clue, they can't define the problem or the nature of a solution.  For a couple decades it was called "global warming."  But, when people pointed out that the world wasn't really warming - and in some places actually cooling, they changed their term - "global climate change."  Ah, yes, global climate change...a much more vague term that can be applied to literally anything that happens.  The ice cap is expanding in Antarctica?  Three feet of snow in Denver in the middle of April?  Glaciers in Alaska getting bigger?  Well of course!  These sorts of thing can be expected as global climate change takes root.  It will impact different parts of the world differently.  You see how it works?  A nice little term that can always be used to "confirm" their theories.

Since the earth has nothing to do with environmentalism, they care little about an ultimate solution.  Ask an environmentalist what the perfect, ideal, world would look like...If we implemented every single thing that they are trying to cram down our throats - would it actually solve ANYTHING?  No.  You see, solving the global climate change threat is a moving target and outlining or, heaven forbid, finding a solution to it would be bad for their movement.

Obviously, I'm not a scientist.  But you wanna know who else isn't a scientist?  Al Gore and most environmentalists!  I'm not saying the climate isn't changing - what I am saying is the likelihood humanity is having even half the impact we're TOLD we're having is wrong.  If you believe you're saving the world by changing the light bulbs in your house - you're crazy.  No offense

But you see, unlike most environmentalists, liberals and Democrats, I'm pro-choice.  Just like I believe I should be able to choose the light bulbs, grocery bags and car I drive, I believe that if people think all of this crap is doing some good, however wrong they may be, I let them do it.  Go ahead, pay more for your car, light bulbs and energy if it makes you feel good.  Sell your house, all your possessions and go live in a cave while you're at it.  I won't stop you.  But just because you think you're saving the world, don't tell me I'm destroying it just because I don't buy your snake oil theories.  I'm reminded of something one of my favorite history teachers of all time use to say - "There's nothing more dangerous that somebody with a cause."  

Friends and neighbors, do what you think is best.  If you really think that the car you drive is responsible for the planet warming, melting the poles and killing polar bears 5,000 miles away, there's probably not much anybody can say that will change your mind.  If you think letting a bunch of whining, bitching, Marxists who've never had a real job in their entire life tell you how to run yours will save the planet - go for it.  There is not a greater threat to freedom and prosperity on this planet than militant environmentalism.  For me, I'm more concerned about environmentalism, and their impact on my life and freedom, than I am of Al Qaeda, Iran, North Korea, Vlad Putin, Hugo Chavez and the boogie man, combined. 

Breathe in, breathe out that sweet, sweet CO2...this week's rant is over.

Read more...

Pic of the Day: Sawdust

Will it end up a porch?  Paper?  A house?  A boat? A desk?  So many options...

Read more...

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Thought of the Day: "Green Movement"

Quick!  Somebody uses the term "green movement" - what is the first thing that pops into your head? 

"Oh, sure.  A green movement.  Collin has those sometimes." 

No, no, no...not those kind of movements.  We're talking about the earth.  The movement to make everything we do "good for the environment."  Sustainable, if you will. 

Environmentalists as we know them today, are a case study in liberal clichés and utter hypocrisy.  Case-in-point:

At the Iowa Blog Cabin, for better or worse, we tend to watch a lot of HGTV.  So last Sunday, we're watching this show about this couple that wants to improve the curb appeal of their home - landscape, front porch, etc.  BUT, they want to do it in a way that is completely "eco-friendly" and "sustainable." 
They begin the project by cutting down the tree in their front yard.  Uhh...  They then proceed to rip out four huge bushes that were in front of their porch.  Uhh...  They then rip up half the grass in their yard, all the way down to bare dirt.  Uhh...  Once they completed their environmental destruction, it was time to save the earth.  They constructed a new porch out of some kind of earth-friendly, recylced, reused, plastic composite.  Great.  They ripped up their old walkway and replaced it with a new one made of "reclaimed" stone.  However, they weren't able to get enough reclaimed stone, so they had to buy new.  The host's reaction to this non-eco-friendly purchase, "It's okay, you tried to buy eco-friendly.  That's all that matters." 

Uhh, no it's not! I yelled.  We're saving the BLEEPING earth here!

No matter.  The earth saving continued.  They planted some flowers in the freshly barren dirt patch (including building a new retaining wall to catch the run-off and erosion caused by the lack of GRASS in the yard).  In order to make sure these newly planted organic children thrive, they topped the new flower bed off with - the pièce de résistance - organic free-range chicken poop fertilizer (I'm totally serious).  You see, it's free range.  It's better for the earth. 

After they were done, the stood in the street, patted each other on the back and congratulated each other on a job well done.  They had improved the curb appeal of the house - sustainably.  In an eco-friendly way.  Ignore the fact they cut down trees, ripped out bushes, ripped out grass in order to do so.  They felt good.

What's more eco-friendly, class?  Doing what these people did, or doing nothing at all?

One more example of how completely insane these people are.  Don't get me wrong, if you want to cut your trees down, I don't care.  If you want to build a new porch, go for it.  If you want to rip up all your grass so you can lay in the front yard and make dirt angels, I won't stop you. 

But don't tell me you're saving the earth.    

Read more...

Pic of the Day: Black Gold


The earth made oil.  All of it.

Read more...

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Thought of the Day: Sustainability

I am absolutely sick of the term "sustainability."  I have for a long time.  It's one more - of the MANY - useless, meaningless, vague terms that the environmental wackos are unwilling to precisely define - until, of course, they decide they want to decide a particular practice "unsustainable."

Farming practices, energy policy, home construction, landscaping, grocery bags, paint, carpet, the "non-organic" food we eat are just a few items that have been deemed unsustainable.  Of course, you must surrender your freedom, free choice and personal preferences and march lock step with this mob of mind numb robots if your lifestyle ever has a chance of being declared sustainable.

So the other day I'm listening to NPR.  They were talking about this group that goes around the world telling "stupid," "moron" farmers that the way they are farming, growing their food and providing for their families is unsustainable.  During this story, they followed this group around as they talked with a bunch Indian cotton farmers. 

The 20-something hippie environmentalist who had never grown anything except pot in his mom's basement explained to these farmers about how the way they were growing their cotton was unsustainable.  The naïve Indian farmer ignorantly responded, "How is our farming practices unsustainable?  My people have been growing cotton like this for over 3,000 years."  Stupid Indian...he just didn't get it.

Read more...

Pic of the Day": Happy Earth Love Day!

Read more...

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

George Carlin - Saving the Planet

Editor's note:  The IBC strives to be a "family friendly" media outlet.  There are a couple words in this video that a person might consider "dirty."  Regardless, it's very much worth watching. 



This video is spot on and a great way to kick of Earth Love Week '09.

Read more...

Pic of the Day: I Heart Coal

Read more...

Monday, April 20, 2009

Hear Ye, Hear Ye!

IOWA BLOG CABIN RESOLUTION NO. 1
BY THE ENTIRE IBC EDITORIAL BOARD
APRIL 19, 2009
An IBC Resolution declaring April 19 – 25 the first annual Earth Love Week.
     WHEREAS, the earth was founded nearly 5 billion years ago, by God, whoever she is; and
     WHEREAS, to the best of our knowledge, this is the only one there is; and
     WHEREAS, the entire editorial board of the Iowa Blog Cabin loves the earth; and
     WHEREAS, the earth has always held a special place in our hearts and is more than a giant blue ball spinning around a giant yellow ball; and
     WHEREAS, by “love,” we mean we love catching fish so we can eat them and we love to cut down trees so we can build cool stuff in the Old Confederate Workshop and we love to drill for sludgy black oil so we can drive around in big SUVs on the roads we’ve paved and we love to mine for coal so that we can put it on trains and take it to power plants to generate electricity that we use to power our air conditioners and big screen TVs and we love to trap fury little woodland creatures that we can skin and use their pelts for fur coats and, last but not least, we love to hide in the weeds and shoot cute little ducks as they fly by so we can force dogs to go fetch them so we can pluck and eat them; NOW THEREFORE,
     BE IT RESOLVED BY THE IOWA BLOG CABIN, that the Iowa Blog Cabin acknowledges the earth on the nearly 5 billionth anniversary of its existence.
     BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Iowa Blog Cabin establishes April 19 – 25 as the official, first annual Earth Love Week for the purposes of bringing enhanced awareness to the existence of the earth, its many trees and plethora of resources and pretty rocks. 

Read more...

Pic of the Day: Mmmm...Carbon

1 mpg.

Read more...

Friday, April 17, 2009

Friday's Rant: Rain, Rain, Go Away

This week's rant is short and timeless.  It has been BEAUTIFUL all week long.  Amazing springtime weather - 60s and even 70s with blue skies and sunshine all week long.  I look out the window and just wish I was outside right now.

BUT, of course, it's the weekend coming up.  I just checked the forecast...Wanna guess the forecast for the weekend?  All rain, all weekend - until 6 p.m. on Sunday night.  Apparently, the high pressure system that is currently over the great lakes is going to be moving out and letting a low pressure system that is currently over New Mexico move in an cause widespread rain over Iowa - especially the Iowa Blog CabinSon-of-a-bleeeep!  Of course, starting Monday and all next week it's suppose to be sunny and warm again. 

I want sunshine on Saturday, dangit!  I want to go outside! I'm tired of looking out my window at nice weather only to wake up to rain on Saturdays!  So, please...in your prayers tonight, pray for the high pressure system currently over the great lakes.  Pray that it stays in place for another day or so.  Pray that Ed Wilson is wrong - it wouldn't be the first time.  Thanks. 

Breathe in, breathe out...this week's rant is over.

Read more...

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Thought of the Day: Thanks, Joe

Thank you, Joe Biden.  Thank you for giving $1,900 to charity last year.  I guess when you spend all of your time confiscating other peoples' money, that doesn't leave time for much else.

Read more...

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Tea Parties

Here's an interesting little nugget.  A Google map of all the "Tea Parties" going on today.  Over 500.  Check it out:

2009 Tea Parties

Pretty impressive.  Of course, I'm sure these are just right-wing extremists.  Watch the media coverage...out of the hundreds of thousands of people participating, if there is one sign they can construe as racist, bigoted, homophobic or whatever, that'll be all we see.

Read more...

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Don't Mess with Texas

Back in the early 1800s, when Texas was a backwater Mexican state, they opened the territory up to Americans for settling.  Pretty much the only requirment in those early days was that they promised to convert to Catholicism.  This opened the floodgates.  Masses of people left their homes throughout the south, abandoned the debt they owed and all of their obligations and left for Texas.  When they left for Texas, they would paint three letters on the homes they abandoned - GTT - Gone to Texas.  It was a sign to everybody - especially their creditors - they had left the country. 

I use to live in Texas and I can say first hand, it really is like another country.  Some people who've never been or lived there, don't understand it.  Some think it comes across as arrogant.  But I love it.  It's a lingering attitude from a time when, most states had an independent spirit.

Well, there's a House Concurrent Resolution going through the Texas legislature right now - HCR 50 - that reaffirms the 10th Amendment to the constitution.  Here's the video from Gov. Rick Perry's speech: 



Also, here's the 10th Amendment to the Constitution:  "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."

And FYI, the fact you've read this now means Homeland Security and the "Janet Reno of the Obama administration," Secretary Janet Nepalitano considers you a right-wing extremist.

Read more...

Friday, April 10, 2009

Friday's Rant: Dudes that wear that Bluetooth Thingie Hanging Out of Their Head For No Apparent Reason

So the other day I’m at the Super-Duper, Extra Large, Mega Wal-Mart - picking up a few of the bare essentials: bread, milk, Honey Bunches of Oats and and a can of Amp energy drink for the ride home.

As I’m walking down the aisle I see this huge black dude walking in front of me with one of those bluetooth thingies hanging out of his ear. He wasn’t talking on it, it was just there.

The same thing happened a few months ago. Being the good citizen that I am, I went to our local lake association board meeting. The meetings are pretty hilarious, actually, made up of half a dozen little Napoleons getting all worked up about lake depth, ditches and silt ponds – you know, the real weighty issues of governance.

As I sat there, one of the astute board members walks in, sits down at the big table and gavels in the meeting.  I quickly realized he was the big enchilada - the "El Jefe" of the lake association. Through the entire meeting, this guy had one of those blue tooth thingies hanging out of his ear – during the meeting.

As I sat there, I’m thinking, “Somebody should nudge him and tell him he forgot to take that thing out.” Then about half way through the meeting he reached up and adjusted it in his ear. He knew it was there! I rolled my eyes.
I could go on listing other examples, but I think you get the point - and I'm sure you know what I mean. So I have to ask, what the heck is going on?  PEOPLE!  If you're walking around with one of those bluetooth thingies hanging out of your ear when you aren't talking on it - or haven't been talking on it for at least five minutes -  you've gotta realize something:  you look weird.  No offense. 

I suppose some people think it makes look important - you know, a mover and a shaker.  But honestly, folks...If you're some dude walking around Wal-Mart at 12:30 on a Tuesday afternoon shopping for cottage cheese with your three illegitimate kids, you're probably not that big of a deal.  No offense. 

Breathe in, breathe out...this week's rant is over.

Read more...

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Obama Apologizes to Descendents of Barbary Pirates

BREAKING NEWS!

Obama Apologizes to Descendents of Barbary Pirates
Obama stops in Tripoli to apologize to the descendents of Barbary pirates for “unfortunate American aggression.”

TRIPOLI, Libya - In an unexpected move, American President Barack H. Obama made a surprise stop in Tripoli, Libya to meet with Col. Khadafi and descendents of Barbary pirates.

Standing on the “shores of Tripoli,” Obama attempted to repair the damage caused by the two Barbary Wars of the early 19th century.

“This beach is a monument. A monument to what happens when the United States fails to see beyond the barrel of a gun and negotiate, in good faith, with international players. Unfortunately, Presidents Jefferson and Madison did not have the vision to engage in a multilateral dialogue and as a result started not only two wars, but also a long and damaging perception that the U.S. is at war with Islam,” Obama said to a cheering crowd of Libyans chanting “Death to America!”  “Today we unite in an effort to begin reversing that perception.”

The motivations and implications of President Obama’s apology weren’t immediately clear. Dr. Richard Shah, Professor Emeritus of North Africa Studies at the University of Southern Vermont commented, “This is a very important admission by an American president and a genuine effort to right the wrongs of past generations and acknowledge what the rest of the world has known for a long time.”

After Obama spoke in Tripoli, Amani Amatullah, a 20 year old woman and direct descendent of Hassan Bey, one of the leaders of the Barbary pirates, spoke with the permission of her 67 year old husband. “Allah be praised! Finally, the American infidels have admitted and apologized for their treachery and arrogance!” When asked if she accepted the President’s apology, she replied, “NEVER! We must continue the work of my descendents and wipe the American infidels from the earth. Unless, of course they are willing to pay us enough money and convert to Islam.”

The first Barbary War began in 1801 when the Barbary Pirates, who had been harassing American trading vessels for years after independence, demanded tribute in order to release the American ships and sailors they had captured and enslaved. The United States refused and war ensued. Obama’s trip marks the first time and American president has visited the site – long a bone of contention between the two nations.

Obama concluded, “When Thomas Jefferson met with the Ambassador from Tripoli he asked him – why are you capturing our sailors in this act of aggression? The ambassador replied, ‘It is written in the Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every muslim who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise.’ The muslim world laid out a path for peace over 200 years ago – we as Americans have been too arrogant to acknowledge it. Today marks a new era in our relationship.”

With that, Obama was hurried into his bullet proof car where he was whisked into a waiting armor plated helicopter and then on to his massive flying fortress jumbo jet to return to America.  The apology marks the latest in a series of apologies he has offered in his whirlwind tour. Great Britain, France, Czech Republic, all of Europe, Asia, Russia, Turkey and Iraq have each received apologies in the last two weeks.  The trip has been declared a success.

Read more...

Monday, April 6, 2009

Seven Angry Liberals

It’s been interesting to watch over the last few days the response to the Iowa Supreme Court’s ruling on gay marriage. Conservatives, Republicans are generally outraged. Liberals, Democrats, Facebookians, Tweeters and other sheep in social media (excluding the IBC, of course) praise it as “equality,” and “acceptance” for an oppressed group that has been unjustly singled out for discrimination.

And of course the media…the whores in the local MSM media are riding this bus ‘til there’s nothing left. In-depth coverage such as the positive angle of gay marriage, the political angle, social angle, cultural angle, religious angle, legal angle and angles of angles are being explored ad hominem.  When all angles are exhausted, wait for the stories in a few months:  "Gay Marriage, [insert number] Months Later:  the Impact on Iowa," etc., etc.  How predictable.

But here at the Iowa Blog Cabin, we’re “noticers.” You don’t just get a seat on the editorial board by dropping the terms “social justice,” “equality,” and “human rights” enough times in a conversation.

Let’s be honest…marriage as an institution is not what it once was. Speaking generally about American society at large, marriage is not seen as a lifetime vow, rooted in Christian values, as it once was. For all intents and purposes, marriage today is little more than a legal structure that is used by lawyers to help decide who gets the couch when the couple breaks up. So, to me, I don’t see how gay people getting married is going to further destroy an institution that really isn’t taken serious my most people anyway.

That’s not to say I support gay marriage – I don’t. Primarily because I don’t agree with what society has done to the institution of marriage.

The real threat that last Friday’s ruling represents is an attack on the idea of self-government. The idea that people can decide the laws they want to govern their own culture and society. Last Friday’s ruling was a unanimous decision by seven un-elected individuals who are not accountable to the voters whatsoever. Now in some ways, this distance from the passions of the “mob” is very important for ensuring justice. But when the judiciary is used as a tool for shaping public policy and legislating, this is where it becomes dangerous.

Those who support the ruling make several arguments: One, this is no different than the civil rights movement of the 1960s and, two, this is exactly the kind of thing the court should be ruling on – the constitutionality of laws passed by the legislature.

To me, these points are quite similar in what they represent. First of all, much of the civil rights movement of the 1960 was in fact legislated – through Congress, state legislatures or through the executive branches – each is an institution that directly answers to the people. Additionally, the civil rights movement was an actual movement that, in many places, changed hearts, minds and the culture – by pointing out the genuine oppression and discrimination of an entire race of humanity. In other words, the culture changed, laws changed (although not always in that order) and voters living in these representative governments had a voice.

In Iowa, the voters had this opportunity – and through the legislature – passed a law defining marriage as between one man and one woman. Rather that working to convince Iowans that the law should be changed and creating an environment where gay marriage would be accepted, the gay rights movement worked through the courts to have gay marriage imposed on the people of Iowa. What happened on Friday can be described no other way.  This case and ruling had nothing to do with achieving justice.  It was, pure and simple, a liberal activist group achieving legislation through the courts that it could not achieve through democratic avenues.

Which brings us to the second argument: it is the role of the Iowa Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of laws and that, simply enough, they ruled Iowa’s marriage law unconstitutional because it violated the “equal protection” clause of Iowa’s constitution. This is what we get when judges, their liberal social agenda in mind, see the constitution as a “living document” and don’t look at what the intent was when the amendment was written. Although this case is regarding the state constitution, the exact argument can be made on the federal level.

Our society legislates, regulates, legalizes, criminalizes and defines behavior based on the society’s culture all of the time. Practically, that’s what the Constitution and Declaration of Independence were when they were written. Much of the basis was founded in the idea that the 13 colonies were analogous to 13 “children” of Great Britain. The 13 children had grown up and it was time for them to be independent. The culture of the 13 colonies had developed so that it was genuinely different from that of Great Britain and that the king and parliament no longer represented their interests.

If society doesn’t have the ability to legislate and codify cultural standards and norms it opens the door to a dangerous cultural relativism where, in the end, the rights of one person or a “micro-minority” out-weigh the rights of the entire majority culture. One tiny group or individual set the policy for what the vast majority must accept simply so that one person or group doesn’t have their “equal protection” violated.

This doesn’t mean that the micro-minority group must be oppressed or discriminated against, but simply that every conceivable lifestyle is not considered equal to that of the vast majority.  There is a difference between institutionalized racim of past generations and not letting gays get married.  Under the Iowa Supreme Court’s logic, explain to me why the polygamist is a criminal? Is his/her equal protection under the constitution not being violated? Why shouldn’t the errant Arkansas hillbilly be permitted to marry his/her cousin? When these comparable examples are brought up to a person who supports gay marriage, they are immediately dismissed as extreme and laughable. But why not? (The answer is as simple as who they tend to vote for…not Democrats.)

Things to think about, Iowa. My problems with gay marriage are many, but the most significant is the fact that the way it is implemented throughout the country is wholly undemocratic and destructive to our idea that we as a people are capable of governing ourselves and creating laws that define our culture.

But each coin has two sides. In the long run, this ruling may set the gay marriage agenda back – significantly. Many states already saw the writing on the wall and passed a constitutional amendment defining marriage. Many others have laws like Iowa had. In nearly every case where a gay marriage ban-type amendment has been brought to a vote, it has passed. Watch to see the number of amendments defining marriage in 2010 that are voted on. There will be a significant number of states that respond to the Iowa ruling by proposing and passing amendments outlining their specific desires.

Gay marriage advocates, right or wrong, could have gotten a lot further by working through the democratic process to attain their goals. By not, and having gay marriage laws imposed on the public, they ensure a much longer fight which will be much harder to legitimately reverse in the court system.

Read more...

Friday, April 3, 2009

Ol-i-gar-chy [ol-i-gahr-kee]

–noun, plural -chies.
a form of government in which all power is vested in a few persons or in a dominant class or clique; government by the few.

Read more...

Cap 'N' Trade

Looks like the Dear Leader's Cap and Tax or Cap and Trade or Cap and Bribe or whatever you want to call it took a pretty big hit in the Senate last night. Here's the article in the WSJ - "Cap and Tax Collapse."  One victory for the little guys.

Read more...

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Wild Kingdom

I'm not sure if I've ever mentioned it, but here at the Iowa Blog Cabin we have a couple cats - Dubya and Daisy.  Dubya is a temperamental old lady who I found on the side of a gravel road when she was a tiny kitten.  She lumbers around the house, often in a bad mood, just waiting for something to get mad about.  Daisy, on the other hand, is a genius.  In fact, she's smarter than a lot of the people I know. 

Case in point:  On the landing going down into our basement, we have their food bowls along with a Rubbermaid bucket full of their food.  The lid on this bucket has two latches with a thick plastic lid on it.  When Daisy gets hungry, she can walk over to it, unlatch the lid, take it off, jump in and eat her dinner.  For the longest time, we'd come home and see the lid on the floor and wonder, "what the heck?"  I would blame Anne for leaving the lid off the cat food while she'd blame me.  It went on like that for a month or so...

Until one day we heard it...and looked down the stairs, and there she was, taking the lid off, jumping in, and chowing down.  Well, I've finally caught it on video (please ignore the annoying American Idol in the background)...Here it is:


Read more...

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP